<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?><!-- generator="wordpress/2.0.5" -->
<rss version="2.0" 
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/">
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Is Outlook 2007 broken? (Or is RSS 2.0?)</title>
	<link>http://inkblots.markwoodman.com/2006/07/10/outlook-2007-broken-or-rss/</link>
	<description>Completely Messing the Point - Notes on cool tech, including RSS and Atom. May contain humor.</description>
	<pubDate>Wed, 07 Jan 2009 13:28:11 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.0.5</generator>

	<item>
		<title>by: Robert Cooper</title>
		<link>http://inkblots.markwoodman.com/2006/07/10/outlook-2007-broken-or-rss/#comment-238</link>
		<pubDate>Tue, 11 Jul 2006 19:59:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://inkblots.markwoodman.com/2006/07/10/outlook-2007-broken-or-rss/#comment-238</guid>
					<description>Well, this is part of what the Microsoft SSE spec is there to help solve. Honestly, however, I am not sure changing the GUID is the right tact. I would expect pubDate to change rather than GUID. Maybe it's just me.

It is strange that SSE didn't even get mentioned. Does this mean Outlook won't honor Microsofts own spec if it is available?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Well, this is part of what the Microsoft SSE spec is there to help solve. Honestly, however, I am not sure changing the GUID is the right tact. I would expect pubDate to change rather than GUID. Maybe it&#8217;s just me.</p>
<p>It is strange that SSE didn&#8217;t even get mentioned. Does this mean Outlook won&#8217;t honor Microsofts own spec if it is available?
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
</channel>
</rss>
